User talk:Xezbeth

Welcome to Wikidata, Xezbeth!

Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!

Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:

• Introduction – An introduction to the project.
• Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
• Community portal – The portal for community members.
• User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
• Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
• Project chat – Discussions about the project.
• Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask on Project chat. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.

Best regards!

^{all subpages T · m:special:CentralAuth}

Bonvenon al Wikidata! – Welcome to Wikidata!

Welcome Xezbeth! You may add some help tools to user:Xezbeth/common.js or (if you use the vector skin) to user:Xezbeth/vector.js . Please see User:Rotsaert8000 (in Esperanto), Wikidata:Tools, and Wikidata:Tools/User scripts for candidates you may add. On the user:i18n-page you will see all WD gadget links. It takes time to see what fits most of your interests. Good luck! Please feel free to use the Wikidata Sandbox item: Wikidata Sandbox (Q4115189)    for your first steps adding some statements ^{see Wikidata:List of properties}. If you want to notify a user you may use {{ping|foo bar}} at any place on this wiki. Regards gangLeri לערי ריינהארט (talk) 21:53, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for sorting out Accel World (Q53351) (I noticed it dropping out of Wikidata:WikiProject Video games/Reports/Platform/PlayStation 3). These items are a pain to split, thanks for doing it :) Jean-Fred (talk) 16:35, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

"simulation video game (Q1610017)"

Hi, I was wondering why you reverted. There was no explanation in the edit summary. Thanks. Huggums537 (talk) 17:29, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

You changed a correct short description to a less correct one. —Xezbeth (talk) 17:42, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Items of Japanese actors or voice actors

Yesterday I was correcting the short description of all the items related to Japanese actors or voice actors and you, for your part, reversed mine without giving any explanation. However, you should not gather so many occupations in itself, you have to follow the example of the other articles (see Wikipedia:Short description#Inclusion of dates), you only have to rewrite the nationality first and then the first occupation in the short description. 148.101.59.159 18:25, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Aoi Yūki (Q1347031) is not known for being an actress. Nor is Aya Hirano (Q237405) or Yui Ogura (Q2477774). Saori Hayami (Q1153079) is just as known as a singer. And so on. I assume you're just going by the first occupation mentioned in their EN wiki article, which is the wrong approach. —Xezbeth (talk) 19:45, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

But those three Japanese voice actors you mentioned did appear in numerous live action productions, for example Aoi Yūki (Q1347031) appears in Cafe Isobe (Q372631) and some in Super Sentai Series (Q1054760) or when Mamoru Miyano (Q519821) recently appears in the movie The Prince of Tennis (Q303674), the other items that I have edited before I am not aware of it, and what do you mean that your approach was wrong? I do not understand you, inform yourself better. 148.101.59.159 00:09, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Short description reversal

G'day Xezbeth, you recently undid the short descriptions I added to athletics at the 2002 Asian Games – men's marathon and 2013 Speedway Premier League. I added these based on WP:SDNONE which states "If an article title is sufficiently detailed that an additional short description would not be helpful,... a description of "none" should be used to remove the article from the missing-description tracking categories." I am curious as to the reasoning behind your reversal. Cheers and happy editing! JohnnyBflat (talk) 11:38, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

That guidance is for the English Wikipedia, not Wikidata. There are no tracking categories here. —Xezbeth (talk) 12:08, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Carmilla

The 1872 novella is data item Carmilla (Q111534222). You are editing the main data item, which is for all editions of the work. The 1872 publication data applies only to the first edition, not to any other editions. --EncycloPetey (talk) 16:18, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Ok, but why call it a novel if it isn't one. —Xezbeth (talk) 16:19, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Are you claiming that no sources call it a novel? There is no precise distinction between novel and novella. If you search, you can find it described as a "novel", a "novella", or a "story". --EncycloPetey (talk) 16:23, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Wikidata supports multiple values. If you think "novella" is the better description, simply give it "Preferred" rank. We do this with conflicting data about birth dates, for example. Both dates are put in, but the one with the better support is marked as "Preferred". The other values remain in place; there is no need to limit a property to a single value. Just mark one as "Preferred". --EncycloPetey (talk) 16:31, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Final Fantasy VII Rebirth

Hi, I noticed there technically missing an item i guess. But I couldn't quite figure it out.

I asked on the Discord wikiproject video games channel:

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q112617712 I think someone with more understanding as to what's going on with these remakes should look into this

FF7 remake. From the wiki page there is The remake the ehanced remake called Remake Intergrade and then a 3rd remake is coming ? but i think there is a wikidata item missing for intergrade ?

wikipedia:

An enhanced version, Final Fantasy VII Remake Intergrade,[b] was released for the PlayStation 5 and Windows in 2021. The second part, Final Fantasy VII Rebirth, is scheduled to release in winter 2023–2024 for PlayStation 5. A third part will complete the story and will follow Rebirth sometime in the future.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Final_Fantasy_VII_Remake1

They said it wasn't worth making it a separate item, but I guess you can make it one. I would agree with making it separate, but I'm somewhat confusing by the naming of all these versions Thibaultmol (talk) 15:21, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

I made a separate item: Q112663549. It has unique entries on various databases so I see no reason why it shouldn't have one. —Xezbeth (talk) 19:40, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Personality Database

Does this database have entries in a mixture of languages, or are all the entries in English? If all the data is in English, then that information should be listed only on the data item for the Database, and not on every reference. Listing it everywhere would be redundant. --EncycloPetey (talk) 21:06, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

I'm not even sure why it's being added while using Wikidata for Web. It didn't to begin with. —Xezbeth (talk) 21:08, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Wait yes I do. It's pulling it from formatter URL (P1630) on Personality Database work ID (P10688) and Personality Database profile ID (P10757). Could just remove it if it's redundant? —Xezbeth (talk) 21:13, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Since it's redundant, I would remove it, yes. That information should only be necessary if the database is multilingual and it's necessary to individually identify the language of each entry in the database. For a single-language database, we just mark the language on the data item for that database, and bots can pull the information from the data item, as needed. --EncycloPetey (talk) 21:50, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Re: wwwyzzerdd

Hi, I noticed that you are a user of my browser extension wwwyzzerdd. I am considering applying for a Wikimedia grant to further its development (for one thing it needs to be rewritten to be compatible with manifest v3 before the 2023 deadline). As part of that I'm contacting some users to get some feedback. If you have some time I would appreciate if you could tell me:

• How do you find the extension? Is it useful to your work?
• What features / functionality would you like added? Are there bugs that you'd like fixed?
• What browser/OS do you use?

Thanks, any feedback is appreciated.

BrokenSegue (talk) 03:39, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

not better "human arm" like "human leg" ?

Hi Xezbeth, can we go with "human arm" as we plan to use below query in one of our applications :-) Thanks for your feedback! Raoul from Munich

SELECT ?item ?itemLabel ?pic WHERE { ?item wdt:P279 wd:Q25452965 .

1. ?item wdt:P361 wd:Q23852 .

?item wdt:P18 ?pic SERVICE wikibase:label { bd:serviceParam wikibase:language "en" } }

item,itemLabel,pic http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q9649,digestive system,http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Digestive%20system%20diagram%20en.svg http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q712604,lymphatic system,http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Illu%20lymph%20capillary%20de.png http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q712604,lymphatic system,http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Blausen%200623%20LymphaticSystem%20Female.png http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q3409626,human head,http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Head%20lateral%20sagittal%20brain.jpg http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q5170145,core,http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Grays%20Anatomy%20image1219.gif http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q6027402,human leg,http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Legs.jpg http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q6309581,human abdomen,http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Anatomy%20Abdomen%20Tiesworks.jpg http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q20645683,human reproductive system,http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Male%20and%20female%20genitalia%20compare.jpg http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q37827521,human neck,http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Female%20neck.jpg http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q107279768,human urinary system,http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Urinary%20system.svg http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q114836833,human appendix,http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Tractus%20intestinalis%20cecum.svg

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q24517852,free upper limb,http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Extended%20arm.jpg really "free upper limb" and not better "human arm" ? Wmpeter649 (talk) 18:35, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

WHO Public Health Prizes and Awards

Hi, I see you have changed the link to all WHO Public Health Prizes and Awards from the lists to a redirect, is that common? FuzzyMagma (talk) 12:47, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

an item about the award should be separate from an item about the list article on Wikipedia, as they aren't the same thing. Linking to the redirect instead made sense to me as that's where an article would be if it were to ever be created. —Xezbeth (talk) 12:50, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

web novel

Hello. I see you have changed the instance of Tensei Shitara Slime Datta Ken (Q115735149). Can you tell me why do you think web novels are no the light novels? As I've said previous, light novels are only a style of novels, so the web novel could be both a novel or a light novel. Web novels are one that published online, but the style doesn't matter. Laftp0 (talk) 06:56, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Shōsetsuka ni Narō works are just novels. Only when picked up by a light novel label and published in tankōbon/bunkōbon format as a light novel are they considered light novels. Calling them light novels on Wikidata is just asking for confusion since the web version is ignored in 99% of cases already. —Xezbeth (talk) 07:01, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

What is the source determines light novels are only published in tankobon? I see many sources including English Wikipedia and Japanese dictionaries determine light novels as a style. Also Naro has a dedicated category for novel series as Junbungaku (Q4160933). Laftp0 (talk) 07:05, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Pokemons

Hello, why each of them is subclass of character and not instance of? Infovarius (talk) 20:08, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Because there's more than one of them. Meowth (Q877650) is not a single instance of a character. —Xezbeth (talk) 20:15, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Kochubey

Hi. Technically, you're probably right. But ! Why separate from other languages? Бучач-Львів (talk) 09:12, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

I was trying to find something useful to link to and Wikidata:WikiProject Names/Disambiguation seems to be the best option. If interwiki links are important then they can be done via redirects per Wikidata:Sitelinks_to_redirects#Disambiguation_page_and_family_name, but that isn't a requirement. —Xezbeth (talk) 09:15, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Besides. The article in EnWiki actually has a disambig template ) look at the code --Бучач-Львів (talk) 09:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

I'm very familiar with how enwiki surname articles are structured. If it's just a list of names with no prose they are considered set index articles, which are still not disambiguation pages. —Xezbeth (talk) 09:20, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

why complicate? as a result, they are "torn off" from similar wikipedia articles by other languages... --Бучач-Львів (talk) 09:22, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

as far as I understand the task of Wikipedia, it should simplify the search for information. --Бучач-Львів (talk) 09:24, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Removal of sitelinks to Soul Eater items on WikiQuote

I believe that on or about 03:40 30 June 2023 you likely removed sitelinks to the articles q:en:Soul Eater: Seasons 1-15 and q:en:Soul Eater: Seasons 16-Current. Can I please have a explanation. Thankyou. -- DeirgeDel ^t_a^c 06:15, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Those Wikiquote articles are utter fan fiction nonsense that should be deleted. They certainly do not need Wikidata items, and not season items since Soul Eater doesn't have any seasons. —Xezbeth (talk) 06:17, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

I nominated them for deletion on Wikiquote, should probably have just done that in the first place. —Xezbeth (talk) 06:27, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

@Xezbeth:: They were already up for deletion at q:en:Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/SoulEaterFan articles and probably best if you simply vote there. I had to drop a car in for servicing and I've come back and fixed the incorrect Vfd-new template that you probably leveraged without realising you'd raised a new VFD. Sorry if this has got a little messy and unclear.-- DeirgeDel ^t_a^c 08:32, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Removing "present in work"

Greetings, I notice that you have made many removals of present in work (P1441), and I couldn't find your explanation or rationale. Could you explain these removals, please? Elizium23 (talk) 17:49, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

That property should be for fictional things, with an exception seemingly made for real people for reasons that I'm not sure I agree with but wasn't going to argue about. The Vatican City is not a person however so I have no problem removing an unreferenced arbitrary link to a single work of fiction, when the Vatican appears in hundreds of fictional works, none of which need to be linked to either. —Xezbeth (talk) 18:07, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

No, the property's name specifically includes "fictionalized" entities, which is an obvious component of incorporating them into a fictional work. "Fictionalized" of course refers only to real-life entities which have been altered by some measure, to suit the story. Elizium23 (talk) 18:40, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

No, a fictionalized entity would be something like United States of America (Q99281400). I am not going to make dozens of such items for the sake of Civilization V of all things, there's no value in doing so. —Xezbeth (talk) 18:44, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

If we needed to create items for their fictionalized versions, the property constraints should have caught that and raised warnings. I don't see any warnings. Elizium23 (talk) 19:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

I believe that is because there is a subject type constraint for artificial object (Q16686448), which includes almost everything. Which looks like it was added after the October 2021 talk page discussion, which seems to agree that it's fine to use this on real objects. I do not feel like arguing so I will revert the other removals. —Xezbeth (talk) 19:11, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

About Date A Live

Sorry. As I am new at wikidata I am trying to add things but there are many things I am not sure of or I do not know about so I take reference from other Items. Can you give me the list of the statements a media franchise has and if possible manga or television series as well? It would be very helpful as I am currently adding statements to Items related to anime (media franchises) or manga. ShahajadaSJ7 (talk) 10:57, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

has part(s) (P527) is really the only important one. country of origin (P495) makes sense, and then identifiers that relate to the wider franchise instead of the separate works, like GameFAQs franchise ID (P6472). —Xezbeth (talk) 11:17, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

dōjinshi

The item calls it a literary genre tho Trade (talk) 17:28, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Yes because you added it. It doesn't even have to be literature, it's a term for any self-published work. —Xezbeth (talk) 17:45, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Whoops. My bad Trade (talk) 19:35, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

What I didn't realise is that dōjin work (Q22669665) also exists, which is probably a better option for things like Gabuli (Q113159248). —Xezbeth (talk) 17:48, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

I moved it to has characteristic (P1552) instead. —Xezbeth (talk) 19:02, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Property in Demon Slayer and Attack on Titan you just fixed

Oops! So sorry for the mistakes I made last night on these two pages, I completely reversed all the data, what a mess! I apologise for the time you had to spend sorting it out; I guess I was too sleepy for that kind of work! Again, I'm sorry and, again, thank you for your contribution! --188.153.222.26 06:48, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

About "Japanese given name" (Q22812564)

Hello. You have removed "Japanese given name (Q22812564)" from the "instance of (P31)" in several entries, why did you do that?

As the explanation says, "Japanese given name" is a "given name prominently found in Japan". "Genjirō (Q111708576)" and "Harumitsu (Q85846081)" are truly Japanese names, and I can assure you that if anyone outside of Japan has these names, he or she is most certainly of Japanese descent. Lombroso (talk) 08:00, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Japanese given name (Q22812564) used to be necessary as undifferentiated Japanese kana given name (Q88865478) wasn't a subclass of it, but it was changed fairly recently. It's a good change in my opinion and now there is no need for the undifferentiated name items to have three separate instances. The separate items for each kanji name should still use Japanese given name (Q22812564), so nothing is being lost. —Xezbeth (talk) 08:14, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Dear sir, i did not find my wikidata page

dear sir , i am sanjit singh arora, i sid not find my wikidata. my wikidata link ( https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q128035527). please check.. and give update please Arora1234 (talk) 18:34, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Multi-track Drafting

Does the tool work for you? I get Internal Server Error Trade (talk) 01:41, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

I just tried using it and it worked fine. —Xezbeth (talk) 03:47, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

recent director and film item edits

Hello Xezbeth,
I want to talk about this change as it seems to replicate information in a way that Default values were designed to prevent (see Help:Default values for labels and aliases). Instead of having one or more Alias(es) for all languages ("aliases / mul"), you doubled the exact same information to the English and German entries.
The second issue is regarding multiple edits did on film items:

• Changing the film's title language - The language of the film title should be set to the real language. Here it's English, not Japanese. The name of the word does not exist in the Japanese language as far as I know. It's a word from the English language and therefore the language should be tagged so accordingly.
• Changing character names to Japanese writing - I see very little use in this change as the majority of the world will not be able to read this. If you think that the name should be included in the Japanese writing system as well, you can add it with a second qualifier using the same property.
• Moving Aliases from Japanese to English - AFAIC an alias should be entered in the language it would be used (spoken, written, etc.) or where it would be understood. The romanisation of Japanese names (Romaji) should therefore be entered in the Japanese alias section. If there is an English name like in the provided example, probably pretty much to nobody would use the Japanese name while speaking English.

--D-Kuru (talk) 08:34, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Mul labels are not for cramming in every possible language. They aren't even supposed to be used on things like films, see Help:Default values for labels and aliases#When should I use default values for labels and aliases? for the current accepted use cases. Japanese films can and do use English titles. The Japanese title for the Japanese film in Japan is AFTERGLOWS so why wouldn't that be used with the title property? Japanese films should use Japanese names for fictional characters what with it being a Japanese film in Japanese, if you want to include another language then create separate items for them. Romanizations are not Japanese and so do not belong as a Japanese label or alias. —Xezbeth (talk) 09:05, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Why do you keep adding invalid cross-language redirect links?

Why do you keep adding invalid cross-language japanese redirect links? This behavior is meaningless. Please wait until someone creates an article on that Wikipedia for that language before you add a cross-language link, okay? Please don't do weird and confusing things. it is meaningless for your behavior.--Znppo (talk) 14:17, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

Redirect links in lieu of an article are perfectly fine. So I'll repeat myself, stop removing them. —Xezbeth (talk) 14:31, 10 November 2024 (UTC)

Takasaki

en:Takasaki (surname) states, that there are 2 kinds of Japanese spellings for this name. Last, there was merged Q127468085 into Q26216269. Looks for me suspicious. This seems to be a merge of 2 different spellings, where one (not in enwiki listed case) seems to appear to Q127452007 [1]. What is your opinion as a Japanese language specialist? Florentyna (talk) 19:32, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

I undid the merge as I believe they should remain separate. The issue is that 髙 is just an alternative form of 高 that only appears in names, so a native Japanese speaker might consider them to be the same thing. I still think they should be separate for Wikidata's purposes though. —Xezbeth (talk) 19:48, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Removed claim: distributed by (P750): NetEase Games (Q62011455)

On the official website for Marvel Rivals, there is an option to download the launcher directly from NetEase Games. StillProcessing (talk) 20:54, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Self-reverted, I just assumed it was an error with publisher (P123) being the intended property. —Xezbeth (talk) 21:34, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear Administrator!

English | español | français | العربية | Nederlands | русский | +/−

An offering for our new administrator from your comrades... (our gift is better than the one at Commons or Meta)

Here's your badge: {{User admin}}/{{#babel:admin}} and {{Admin topicon}}. Enjoy!

Congratulations! You now have the rights of administrator on Wikidata. Please take a moment to read the Wikidata:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Wikidata:Project chat, Wikidata:Requests for comment, and Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings, or modifications of protected pages.

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikidata-admin^connect. If you need access, you can flag someone down at #wikidata^connect. You may find Wikidata:Guide to Adminship to be useful reading. You may also want to consider adding yourself to meta:Template:Wikidata/Ambassadors, and to any similar page on your home wiki if one exists. (Check Wikipedia:Wikidata/Wikidatans (Q14964498).)

Please also add/update the languages you speak to your listing at Wikidata:List of administrators and Wikidata:Administrators/Timeline. You may also like to add your username to this list if you would not like that items you delete at RfD get marked as deleted automatically. Again, welcome to the admin corps!

Ymblanter (talk) 14:32, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

The Simpsons Wikidata

Hi, since the page can't be edited by everyone, can I ask you a little thing? In the Italian Wikidata of The Simpsons, "(1989-)" should be removed (since in all the other Italian Wikidata about animated series there's no such thing) 87.14.101.46 16:58, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Nishii

Nishii (Q55644266) is just latin transliteration of Japanese surname Nishii (Q125500544) not real surname. Look at what links here. No need to keep two items separately. fryed-peach (talk) 08:19, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

It should still be separate, and used for items like Kanae Nishii (Q36607330) where their native name is not provided. It is also quite possible for non-Japanese people to have this surname, and their name would never be written as "にしい". —Xezbeth (talk) 08:30, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

I see you edited Kanae Nishii (Q36607330) to artificially create usecase there. If you see Nishii (Q55644266) as non-Japanese surname and Kanae Nishii (Q36607330) is obviously Japanese, why add it as P734? You should first check nationality and native spelling of name then make statement, am I wrong? About "It is also quite possible for non-Japanese people to have this surname", it's highly dubious. No need to pre-create such items, I think. fryed-peach (talk) 09:08, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

That was just an example. Here's a better example: Tomoko Nishii (Q91506419). There is no way of knowing for sure if this person is Japanese. Their only paper is in an American journal, Nishii (Q55644266) is therefore the correct item to use in lieu of more information. Please see Wikidata:WikiProject Names#Basic principles for why the two name items should remain separated even if there weren't any use cases. —Xezbeth (talk) 09:41, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

animated reality show (Q77253697)

Hey is it okay with you if we keep this genre item? I feel like it's unique enough to justify Trade (talk) 04:51, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

I wasn't considering that as part of the nomination anyway. animated sitcom (Q4765080) also needs to exist for obvious reasons. —Xezbeth (talk) 04:57, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Help needed for Q132201167

Hello,  

I am trying to add the description "2024 book by Chiman Maru" to the entity Q132201167, but I am unable to do so. Could you please help me with this?  

Thank you!   2401:4900:792A:15CB:CED:782E:990F:9AA6 13:03, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Dandadan (Q123564285) and Dandadan (Q108069627)

Hello Xezbeth,

I noticed that you are an administrator of Wikidata.

Thank you for the continuous contributions.

You removed claim: different from (P1889) and mentioned "they are already linked"

Does that mean they are already linked as derivative work?

Unfortunately, most Japanese Wikidata contributors only view Wikidata in Japanese.

'Different from' is expressed as '以下と異なる' in Japanese and is very useful for drawing attention to the fact that manga series and anime TV series exist as distinct entities in the database.

Due to many contributors being unaware of this fact, there is a persistent issue with contributors adding Japanese anime television series information to Dandadan (Q108069627).

Additionally, I believe there's a benefit to preserving 'different from (P1889)' for Dandadan (Q123564285), as it allows users to differentiate between Dandadan (Q123564285) and Dandadan (Q108069627) directly on the Wikidata page for Dandadan (Q123564285).

If there are no technical limitations, I believe it would be acceptable to maintain both 'different from' and 'derivative work' simultaneously.

Even considering this point, would it be better to only keep 'derivative work'? Keepwishes (talk) 07:56, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

I have re-added them since they're ultimately harmless, but the presence of different from (P1889) is not going to dissuade anyone from adding the wrong information to the wrong item, it happens all the time. —Xezbeth (talk) 08:00, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your understanding. I completely agree with your final point. You're absolutely right. I appreciate your insight and perspective on this matter. Keepwishes (talk) 08:15, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Japanese film alias

Hello Xezbeth, question for edits like this one on many Japanese films like Let's Go Karaoke! (Q130403947): Why did you add this as English alias if this is clearly not English, as the words don't have any meaning in English but they are rather romanization of Japanese (Q192509). So actually "Japanese language written in Latin script" --D-Kuru (talk) 12:17, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Please refer up the page to the last time you asked me that question. Romanizations are not Japanese. —Xezbeth (talk) 12:19, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the note, seems I forgot about this (or had no time to respond, I can't remember)

"Romanizations are not Japanese and so do not belong as a Japanese label or alias." - It's not English either. You wouldn't enter a German Alias in the English field either. It's an alias that only makes sense for people who are able to read/understand Japanese. So as there is no place for text in Japanese language that is not written in a Japanese writing system, there would be no place for such information --D-Kuru (talk) 10:33, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

It is "English". Me and the Alien MuMu (Q131348648)'s English Wikipedia article is correctly titled "Uchūjin Mūmū" until an official English translation appears. If it never appears, then it will remain at that title. This is the case for tens of thousands of other items already. —Xezbeth (talk) 10:38, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

No, sorry it's not English. en:Romanization of Japanese: "The romanization of Japanese is the use of Latin script to write the Japanese language."

You self confirmed this logic with "until an official English translation appears" which means that the name itself is not translated and thereby not English. Using the name from a different language for something just because the work has no official name in one language does not make it part of the language. eg. "facebook" is a name that comes from the english language. Just because ja:Facebook exists does not make "facebook" a word that has a Japanese meaning. It is may included into the language over time with it's own meaning, but it does not originate from that language.

--D-Kuru (talk) 17:48, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Adaptation Relationship for original manga and novel version

Hello Xezbeth, thank you for creating the Wikidata items for The Ayakashi Hunter's Tainted Bride manga (Q132316560) and novel (Q132316558). There seems to be a mix-up in their adaptation relationship – actually the manga is the original work, with the novel being its adaptation (as referenced the article). I tried to edit Q132316558 yesterday but might have made unintended mistake due to my Wikidata inexperience.(I'm so sorry....) Could you please correct their "based on/derivative work" and other details? Thank you for your consistent contributions to maintaining! Sofmkr (talk) 18:43, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, since that was a mistake on my part I just swapped a few properties around to fix it. —Xezbeth (talk) 19:41, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Thank you so much! ☺️ I just realized there's an additional detail regarding the Japanese titles that I should mention – the novel version was published without any subtitle. My apologies for overlooking this point earlier.

For the original manga, while the subtitle was removed in the tankōbon releases starting from Vol6, it still appears on the serialization platform Palcy. I believe retaining the subtitle for now would better reflect its current usage, but I defer to your expertise on Wikidata conventions. Thanks again for your help! 🥹 Sofmkr (talk) 11:41, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for adding MyWaifuList Character IDs to the Overlord characters last month & thanks for your prolific contributions to anime data on this site in general. IntensionalLogican (talk) 03:33, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Deleted Pages: Kinship & TheWildest.com

I am curious about how I can submit items for Kinship Partners (publisher owned by MARS Petcare) and TheWildest.com a former publication operated by Kinship.

We are trying to sort out some confusion with these entities and I am adding records on behalf of the Kinship organization. RyanMarkacy (talk) 22:42, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Q134452865

Bonjour Xezbeth,

J'ai créé une page pour Eurodist. J'ai fait attention de ne publier que des éléments réels et en me basant également sur des entreprises du même secteur. Etant donné que vous l'avez supprimé, je suppose que j'ai comis de grave erreur. Pourriez-vous me dire ce que je dois faire pour ne pas vous heurter et pouvoir publier une fiche pour Eurodist ? Je vous remercie pour votre attention et vous souhaite une belle journée, Philippe --- I do not speak English, so I used a tool to translate my message. Thank you. Hello Xezbeth, I created a page for Eurodist. I made sure to include only factual information, also based on companies in the same sector. Since you deleted it, I assume I made a serious mistake. Could you please tell me what I should do to avoid causing offense and be able to publish a page for Eurodist? Thank you for your attention, and I wish you a great day. Philippe PhHoe (talk) 07:03, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

I restored the item; Looking at it again I was probably too hasty in deleting it. Would need a discussion at the very least. —Xezbeth (talk) 07:38, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Q107076696

Itsuki Nanao is a primary author of the Apothecary Diaries manga, effectively the writer although it says "Compiled by" on the covers of the books. See here. You made some changes to remove this relationship, but it should be restored. Jwillikers (talk) 14:03, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

Restored, but I feel it needs a qualifier or different property. Not sure what though. —Xezbeth (talk) 14:13, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

Q134285843

Hello Xezbeth, I'm reaching out regarding the deletion of the Wikidata item for 1001Pneus (Q134285843), which you removed on July 4, 2025, citing "spam / advertising" as the reason.

I represent 1001Pneus, a French company founded in 2009 and well-established in the online tire retail industry. We are featured in multiple independent and reliable sources (including Auto Plus, Journal du Pneumatique, La Tribune, Affilae, among others).

The company generates tens of millions of euros in annual revenue, operates in several countries, and works with a network of over 4,000 partner garages.

Our intention with the Wikidata item was not promotional, but rather to provide factual, well-sourced and structured data that meets Wikidata’s notability and verifiability standards.

I would appreciate the opportunity to understand the specific concerns that led to the deletion, and whether a properly sourced and neutral recreation of the item could be considered acceptable.

Thank you in advance for your time and feedback, Gabin Berthet

Media Citation : https://journaldupneu.com/marche/1001pneus-a-trouve-a-qui-parler https://auto.zepros.fr/sourcing/magali-massa-1001pneus-est-corde-supplementaire-notre-arc https://affilae.com/fr/comment-1001pneus-utilise-affilae-pour-dynamiser-ses-ventes-en-ligne/ https://journaldupneu.com/distribution/cdiscount-cede-1001pneus-au-groupe-massa/ https://www.autoplus.fr/actualite/les-incontournables/publi-reportage/1001pneus-les-pneus-moins-chers-sont-sur-internet-315178.html SEO1001Pneus (talk) 07:21, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

@Xezbeth Can you check please ? SEO1001Pneus (talk) 07:36, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Items that are intended to boost your SEO score will be deleted as spam; I'm sure you can guess where I got that impression from. If you truly think it is notable then instead of recreating you can request undeletion at Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard. —Xezbeth (talk) 07:46, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply.

Just to clarify: I’m the one who originally created the item, and I’m directly involved in the company. The goal wasn’t SEO but to provide structured, factual data with reliable sources.

As suggested, I’ve submitted a request for undeletion on the Administrators’ Noticeboard : https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Request_for_undeletion_of_1001Pneus_(Q134285843)

Best,

Gabin SEO1001Pneus (talk) 09:05, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Request to undelete the recent Wikidata IDs

Could you please undelete the set of newly created IDs, please? I am creating IDs for a research project on historical travel accounts and am adding a number of places that are either lesser known or have since disappeared, e.g. small settlements, country estates, etc. Each location will be included and described in the digital editions of the research project: https://editions.curioustravellers.ac.uk/ Bydbach (talk) 09:52, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

I restored the three that I deleted: Haugh Head (Q135103760), Gatherley Moor (Q135182354), Ormathwaite (Q135190119). Make sure to at least add an instance of (P31) statement, even if you intend to come back later and populate them properly. Items with no statements at all could be deleted at any time. —Xezbeth (talk) 10:01, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

Noted. This was the first time I'd created IDs and had intended to come back at a later time and include the refs. Apologies! Bydbach (talk) 10:59, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

request to undelete Q135190260

I spent quite a long time following all of the guidelines but it's been flagged as advertising/spam, there were all the right links and references in place, it wasn't advertising or spam, it followed the rules, can you explain why it was deleted? did i do something wrong? Robin Hind (talk) 12:57, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

Yes I've seen the company + "author" + amazon link triple SEO spam attempt more than once. I will not restore it. —Xezbeth (talk) 14:20, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

it's not spam, can you explain how it hasn't followed the rules? I don't understand? Thanks Robin Hind (talk) 12:05, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Toward the Terra

Hello Xezbeth, I saw your revert of one of my edits from 2024. I apologise for my mistake and for having compromised the page in question. I've been active on Wikidata for just over a year now, but even today I still don't feel fully prepared to handle things comprehensively, as every subcategory has its own way of being managed and its own set of unwritten rules (manga, novels, animated series, OVAs, live-action productions… all have different handling methods). As a rule, I tend to edit only items relating to films and people, as those are the ones I’ve been better guided on by other users. So I’d like to ask: since there is a conflation (Q14946528), shouldn't the item in question be restructured? Specifically, shouldn’t the animated video work and the written manga be split into two separate items? After all, they have different release years and, of course, different teams of people involved in their creation. Having everything combined in one item makes things quite confusing. I look forward to your advice — always happy to learn something new! --Wiccio (talk) 07:54, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

Yes, it's one of many that needs to be split. I will get round to it myself eventually, but removing properties without splitting them off is the worst solution as I might not even notice that it wasn't split out. I only noticed this one because the description hadn't been updated. —Xezbeth (talk) 08:45, 2 August 2025 (UTC)

RE: Undelete Q135917473

Hello, this entity is not spam, please do not establish unchecked facts. Neex Limited is a registered and regulated financial services organization. Help me improve towards becoming a better editor on Wiki. Please do the needful with urgency. Thank you. Q135917473 Warm regards 115.164.33.25 16:16, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

Undelete Q64485317 Request

Hello Xezbeth,

I noticed that the Apex Pest Control item Q64485317 was deleted for reasons related to spam/advertising. I wanted to reach out respectfully to better understand and ensure compliance with Wikidata policies.

Background: The Apex Pest Control entry has existed since around 2019–2020. I recently updated the item with current information (e.g., memberships, accreditations, service area) and added references to reliable sources.

Shortly after these edits, the entry was deleted. When I recreated it with a factual approach, it was also removed.

My intention: I’m aiming to maintain a factual, non-promotional record of the company. I’ve sourced information from independent and verifiable references, not just the company’s own website.

For example: Award received (P166): Apex Pest Control Barnsley was named “Installer of the Month – November 2024” by Defender® Bird Spikes (birdspikesonline.co.uk) — an independent industry recognition.

Trade association memberships (P463): The company is a member of both the BPCA and NPTA, as confirmed on their service pages (apex-pest-control.co.uk/leeds).

Inception (P571): The company was established in 2016, as noted on the “About Us” page (apex-pest-control.co.uk/about-us).

My questions: Could you clarify which specific aspect of the entry was judged as promotional or non-compliant, given the above references?

If the subject does not currently meet Wikidata’s notability criteria, is there a recommended path (e.g., waiting for more independent coverage or press)?

Are there formatting or sourcing adjustments I can make so that a neutral, verifiable version of the item can exist?

I’d be very grateful for your guidance so I can ensure any future edits are fully in line with Wikidata’s standards.

Thank you for your time and support,

QuillOrbit7 QuillOrbit7 (talk) 08:18, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Why is that formatted like an LLM churned it out. Anyway if you think it is notable then request undeletion at Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard; I am not undeleting promotional content for minor companies. —Xezbeth (talk) 09:32, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Undelete Q135654650 request

Please explain why you deleted my entry for Endeavor Agency, Inc.? I am under the impression that WikiData is supposed to be more lenient when it comes to notability than Wikipedia, and that it is an option available for small businesses to be able to be seen by LLMs and not get left behind in this new search era. I referenced several external links, including our Google Business Page with reviews, Yelp page with reviews, and other web listings. I followed the directions to build this page.

If it is a matter of editing the description, I can do that, instead of the page being deleted. CareerCoachingContributor (talk) 21:18, 25 August 2025 (UTC)

You were under the wrong impression. Spam and promotional content will be deleted. —Xezbeth (talk) 03:53, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

What was spam/promotional within the text, in your judgment? I will take it out to comply. CareerCoachingContributor (talk) 15:43, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Please undelete Q135457976

This item may have been immature, but I will provide more information. If you did not notice, it is linked from Meta page templates. Thank you. Susanna Ånäs (Susannaanas) (talk) 05:55, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Restored. Try to at least add an instance of (P31) statement when creating a new item, even if you intend to add to it later. —Xezbeth (talk) 05:58, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. – Susanna Ånäs (Susannaanas) (talk) 14:17, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Request for undeletion of Silvia Barroso and Nexus Dupla

Hello Xezbeth,

Yesterday, when I logged in intending to continue completing the items for Silvia Barroso and Nexus Dupla, I found they had already been deleted. I hadn’t realized that leaving them incomplete would result in removal, as I thought it was possible to build them step by step. I would like to kindly request their restoration, since I have now gathered multiple reliable, independent references that demonstrate notability according to Wikidata’s criteria. Here is a representative selection:

1. CTO AI Summit 2025 – official program listing Silvia Barroso as Founder of Nexus Dupla, talk “Beyond UX: The Rise of Intelligence Experience” (plus official social posts by @ctoaisummit).

🔗 https://ctoaisummit.com/schedule/

2. Magnolia CMS – Air Europa case study (official site, Silvia Barroso credited as UX Manager).

🔗 https://www.magnolia-cms.com/customers/case-study/air-europa.html Conference presentation (Air Europa/Magnolia, YouTube official channel).

🔗 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0CUD1s8gOE

3. Interview – Multiplica Talent (2021, Medium): “Lo importante es estar en sintonía con las necesidades del usuario”.

🔗 https://medium.com/multiplicatalent/lo-importante-es-estar-en-sinton%C3%ADa-con-las-necesidades-del-usuario-6e3838ee192

4. Xperience Builders Congress (2019, YouTube) – “Juego de Tronos” UX talk.

🔗 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_rHIaAjWqg

5. Anorta Podcast (2022, RedCircle) – interview episode with Silvia Barroso.

🔗 https://redcircle.com/shows/anorta-podcast/ep/25c7f59b-4351-433f-8dc9-19f8e21e3b66

6. OpenExpo Europe – Speaker profile.

🔗 https://openexpoeurope.com/es/speaker/silvia-barroso-padilla/

7. Archived article – StartUC3M (2016, Wayback Machine): coverage of Silvia Barroso’s talk at Google Campus Madrid (“The last mile is the least traveled”).

🔗 https://web.archive.org/web/20200810150712/https://startuc3m.com/disenadores-tenemos-deber-democratizar-informacion/

8. Press coverage – Fundación Marqués de Oliva (2017) and Merca2 (2017): article on entrepreneurship and mental health, citing Silvia Barroso as founder of Alevosía.

🔗 https://fundacionmarquesdeoliva.com/emprender-y-caer-a-los-abismos-el-estigma-de-la-salud-mental-en-las-startups/

9. Historical press – IDG iWorld (2000): “Alevosia.com, a new visual experience for women” (profile of the project Silvia Barroso co-founded in 2000, highlighting pioneering use of WAP & VR).

🔗 https://web.archive.org/web/20120408093722/http://www.idg.es/iworld/articulo.asp?id=113061

10. iBest Awards 2001 – Alevosia selected Top 3 in “Best Women’s Website” and “Best Marketing Campaign” (the so-called “Oscars of the Internet” in Spain).

(The original iBest Award 2001 pages are no longer live, but archival references and press mentions confirm Alevosía’s Top 3 selection)

I also have many further sources (additional interviews, podcasts, roundtables, corporate case studies, and archival captures), but I have kept this list concise for clarity.

👉 If the items can be restored, I will complete them immediately with all the reliable sources and statements I have already gathered, so they won’t remain incomplete.

Thank you very much for your time and consideration.

Best regards,

Silvia (Gin73)

---

PS @Xezbeth:: I kindly ask for your review of this request. @Bovlb:: tagging you for context since you were involved earlier and I asked you for help.

Thank you both. Gin73 (talk) 10:45, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

It was deleted via Wikidata:Requests for deletions and supported by two other editors. I also deleted it because it's blatant promotion. YouTube videos and podcast interviews are not going to convince me otherwise. —Xezbeth (talk) 12:02, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Requesting undeletion for Ahmad Yani park item on Wikidata

Hello Xezbeth

Currently, I and my team from Indonesia are working on a Rapid Fund project, WikiPublicSpaces, to open the access of all public spaces in Medan City, Indonesia. I think this Ahmad Yani park item is eligible to be put on Wikidata since it is covering the public interest (many people necessity of information to accessible public space) and it already been here since a long time. Apologize for my bad quality of the item, maybe it still lack of references and main structure, but I don't think it should be deleted.

Kindly regards Nafisathallah (talk) 08:26, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Restored both: Gajah Mada park (Q135898780)/Ahmad Yani park (Q135898813). Make sure to add at least one statement when creating new items; empty ones can be deleted at any time. —Xezbeth (talk) 08:28, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Request for undeletion: Hudson Square Properties, 345 Hudson Street, and 555 Greenwich

Hello Xezbeth,

I would like to request undeletion of three items you deleted as spam/advertising:

• Q135748340 — Hudson Square Properties
• Q135749013 — 555 Greenwich
• Q135748936 — 345 Hudson Street

Hudson Square Properties, a joint venture of Hines, Trinity Church Wall Street, and Norges Bank Investment Management, has been the subject of coverage in independent, third-party sources, demonstrating that the venture meets Wikidata’s notability guidelines (WD:N). Two of its key properties — 555 Greenwich and 345 Hudson Street — have also received independent coverage:

• ConnectCRE: CBRE tapped to lease 6M SF portfolio
• Commercial Observer: Brooklinen lease at 225 Varick Street
• New York YIMBY: 555 Greenwich office tower opens
• New York YIMBY: New lease at 555 Greenwich and 345 Hudson Street
• Commercial Observer: Fanatics lease at 345 Hudson Street

These independent sources provide substantive coverage of the joint venture and its portfolio buildings. On this basis, I respectfully request undeletion of all three items.

Thank you, 162.154.130.75 14:06, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

Seems reasonable, so undeleted. The promotional tone of the descriptions is what I was reacting to, so I've fixed those myself. —Xezbeth (talk) 14:17, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

Why did you delete Q135639454?

Instead of obliterating people's work at least retain it and give a suggestion for change? How is it spam/advertising when i'm putting up my company's legit information? This isn't even for SEO or whatever. Neilt123 (talk) 08:34, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

Request for undeletion of Adrianos Facchetti (Q135077031)

Hello Xezbeth,

I noticed that the item on Adrianos Facchetti (Q135077031) was deleted for spam/advertising. I’d like to kindly request undeletion, as I believe the subject meets Wikidata’s notability criteria.

Here are independent, verifiable sources that help establish his notability:

• California Bar Association official record: California State Bar License Profile (government site confirming attorney license and standing).
• Local news coverage: MyBurbank article (recognition as Best Attorney in Burbank, with additional biographical details).
• Legal directory listing: Martindale-Hubbell attorney profile (established independent directory confirming credentials and professional background).

These references demonstrate that the subject is a licensed attorney, recognized locally through independent media, and listed in national legal directories. I understand that promotional links (like his law firm site or referral networks) are not sufficient, so I am focusing only on third-party, independent sources.

Thank you for your time and consideration. Please let me know if I should provide additional references.

Best regards,

— Facchettilaw Facchettilaw (talk) 10:18, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

Restored since I'm not sure what the notability threshold for lawyers would be. I haven't restored the empty items that went with it. —Xezbeth (talk) 11:16, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

By the criteria laid out by Facchettilaw, nearly every licensed lawyer is notable. I'm also not sure what the notability threshold is, but what Facchettilaw proposes is none at all. (Which isnt to say that AF isnt notable, simply that the 3 refs arent particularly strong.) Jerimee (talk) 20:01, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

deleted Q136523688 item

Xezbeth, you can not just delete items without deleting links to those items. Your deletion of Q136523688 broke c:Category:Futari wa Pretty Cure which started showing some LUA errors. Please be more careful. Jarekt (talk) 03:16, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

That was because I didn't fully revert a sockpuppet at Q1151646, not because of the (correct) deletion of that item. —Xezbeth (talk) 05:14, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Request for undeletion: Jugni Travel

Dear Xezbeth,

I am requesting reconsideration for the undeletion of the item "Jugni Travel" (Q135778854), which was deleted in August 2025 for lack of independent sources.

Since then, multiple secondary references have been added publicly verifying Jugni Travel’s notability and independent coverage:

• Economic Times (Panache feature): https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/take-a-break-opt-for-some-me-time-brilliant-options-to-make-solo-travel-a-dream/articleshow/64230836.cms
• ScoopWhoop article on women’s travel groups: https://www.scoopwhoop.com/inothernews/travel-companies-for-solo-women-travelers/
• Verified business listing on TripAdvisor: https://www.tripadvisor.in/Attraction_Review-g304551-d33534358-Reviews-Jugni_Travel-New_Delhi.html
• Verified presence on Bing Places and Google Business Profile (entity cross-links available).

The company has been covered independently by multiple news publications and review platforms since 2014, meeting Wikidata’s notability criteria for organizations (see: [2](https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Notability#Organizations)).

Requesting restoration or permission to recreate the item with these verified references. Thank you for your consideration. Jugni travel (talk) 03:32, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

I don't restore blatant promotional items, especially when it has subsequently been deleted via Wikidata:Requests for deletions which you forgot to mention. —Xezbeth (talk) 05:01, 7 November 2025 (UTC)