Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard

Administrators' noticeboard

This is a noticeboard for matters requiring administrator attention.

• If you wish for something to be deleted, please use Wikidata:Requests for deletions.
• If you want to report a bug in Wikidata software, please use Wikidata:Report a technical problem or Phabricator.
• Matters not requiring administrator action should be raised at Project chat.
• Matters that may involve CheckUser should be raised at Wikidata:Requests for checkuser.
• To report vandalism on Wikidata, please click here.
• Please add {{section resolved|1=~~~~}} to resolved sections.

IRC channel: #wikidata^connect

Translate this header box!

Start a new discussion

On this page, old discussions are archived. An overview of all archives can be found at this page's archive index. The current archive is located at 2026/01.

SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 1 day and sections whose oldest comment is older than 7 days.

Requests for deletions

high

_{~120 open requests for deletions.}

Requests for unblock

empty

_{0 open requests for unblock.}

~2025-35196-16

• ~2025-35196-16 (обс. · журналы · блокировки · фильтры · whois)

The user insists on changing the description of the Partido Missão (Q134984491) and the Movimento Brasil Livre (MBL) (Q20135510) . The references show that it is a right-wing party, but he is making up information and insisting on trying to portray it as center-right. I have already warned him about this and he continues to change it. Nicolas Baldin (talk) 15:34, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

I would like to say that he appears to be a member of that party and movement. They hate being classified as politically right-wing. Nicolas Baldin (talk) 15:37, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Report concerning User:~2025-35196-16 (2nd)

~2025-35196-16 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) This user keeps removing patterns from Brazilian politicians, parties, and governments. I request an urgent block. Reversing this is exhausting. Nicolas Baldin (talk) 17:32, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

He also doesn't accept that his edits are flawed and keeps redoing them. Please do something! Nicolas Baldin (talk) 17:34, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

I can't see where you have communicated with this user, so I'mm not sure what this "doesn't accept that his edits are flawed" language is about.

I have notified the user of this discussion.

Looking through their edits, it's not clear what you're referring to. Could you provide some specific links? Bovlb (talk) 18:24, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

I have reversed this reversion you made. I'm not sure why you thought that was appropriate. Bovlb (talk) 18:29, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

The reporter conveniently didn't mention his portugese Wikipedia history [1].[2] [3]. Infrastruktur (talk) 19:21, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Since the reporter shows an affinity for socks and signs of continuing the same behavior here, I believe checkuser is advised. Infrastruktur (talk) 19:28, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Undeletion Request: Q137293064 (A.P. Rossellot'h)

I am requesting the undeletion of the item Q137293064 ("A.P. Rossellot'h"), originally deleted by User:Madamebiblio.

Reason for request: Significant new authority sources have become available that verify notability criteria and satisfy the requirements for undeletion:

• 1. Press Coverage (Cadena 3): Featured in "Cadena 3" (Major Argentine news network), verifying public relevance.
  • Link to Article

• 2. Google Books Authority: The book is now fully indexed with a valid ID (ScqeEQAAQBAJ) and text preview, proving existence and editorial content.
  • Link to Google Books Entry

Procedural Note: I have attempted to contact the deleting administrator regarding these new sources on their User Talk page twice (11 December and 17 December 2025). Although the administrator has been active editing recently (as of 23 December), I have received no response.

Given the lack of communication and the presence of these new verifiable sources, I request an impartial review and restoration of the item to allow the inclusion of this data.

Thank you. CosmicLibrarian (talk) 23:46, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

This looks self-published with Amazon. It might be a good book, but how can we know if we can't rely on a publisher doing the vetting job for us? IIRC Wikidata is more inclusive when it comes to books than for other items that might be prone to promotion, but if it is self-published it's still gong to need some significant indications of notability. If it's brand new I don't see how it could have managed to attain this yet. The book The Martian (Q17111624) was also self-published with Amazon, but it had a movie made and got its own Wikipedia page. Infrastruktur (talk) 13:14, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

Cadena 3 article does not mention the author's name. The external identifiers and sources provided for the book do not confer notability to the book or the author. Madamebiblio (talk) 00:28, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Just a note that this item seems to have been created twice: Q137293064 (CosmicLibrarian), Q137322904 (CosmicLibrarian). Bovlb (talk) 18:34, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello. Addressing the concerns regarding notability and source verification:

1. Visual Verification (Press Source): Regarding the concern that the text does not mention the name: The Cadena 3 article's featured image is the book cover itself, which clearly displays the author's name ("A.P. Rossellot'h"). The source visually verifies the authorship.
2. Bibliographic Authority (Google Books): The Google Books entry (ID: ScqeEQAAQBAJ) is an official bibliographic record listing "A.P. Rossellot'h" as the author in its metadata.
   • Google Books Entry
3. External Identifiers & Structural Necessity: The author entity is already indexed in multiple international bibliographic databases. Restoring the Wikidata item is necessary to house these External Identifiers (Properties like P2963, P648, P3832, etc.). The entity is verifiable in:
   • Goodreads: Author Profile
   • OpenLibrary: Author Profile
   • Babelio: Author Profile
   • LibraryThing: Author Profile
   • QueLibroLeo: Author Profile

Conclusion: This request is for a Wikidata Item, not a Wikipedia Biography. The entity exists across the bibliographic ecosystem. Denying the item prevents valid data linking of these existing identifiers.

I ask for the restoration to allow the correct structural linking of this data. Thank you. CosmicLibrarian (talk) 09:20, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

The cadena 3 article doesn't appear to show the author's name. Statements such as these reeks of LLM use.

These all appear to be crowdsourced sites and doesn't count as serious references for that reason. For a self-published book the requirement of serious references is de-facto higher than for books that have a traditional publisher. In addition your edit history strongly suggests that you either are promoting your own products or accepting money for promoting someone else's product. Out policies require that people disclose if they are doing paid editing. Editing on items where where someone is likely to have a conflict of interest is also discouraged. And editing for the sole purpose of promotion is not wanted on this site. Infrastruktur (talk) 12:48, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

@Bovlb: Thanks for pointing out the duplicate. It was an honest mistake because I am new to this process. In fact, I am here because you kindly directed me to contact the original deleting admin when I asked about that second item. I am just trying to follow your instructions to do things correctly.

@Infrastruktur: Regarding your comment, English is not my native language (I speak Spanish). I use translation tools and AI to help me structure my sentences correctly and be respectful to the community. Using a tool to overcome a language barrier does not make the data false. The sources provided (like Cadena 3 and Google Books) are real and verifiable regardless of how I write this message. I am just asking for a fair review of the sources. CosmicLibrarian (talk) 20:32, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Right. If we decide to undelete, we should undelete both and merge them.

I agree that use of an AI, especially across languages, is not a problem in itself; it can be a wonderful accessibility tool. People are a little wary of it here, as it is often associated with a lack of engagement, or a failure to read and understand policy. Bovlb (talk) 23:50, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

"Using a tool to overcome a language barrier does not make the data false." Actually, that's exactly what it does in this case. Either what your posted was reviewed by you and posted even if you knew it contained falsehoods, or you did not read through the LLM response. Either demonstrates a lack of respect for volunteers' time. Infrastruktur (talk) 15:30, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

Undeletion request for Karen Becker (Q137564249)

Undeletion request for Karen Shaw Becker who is a New York Times best-selling author and noted veterinarian. The item Karen Becker (Q137564249) was posted in AFD at 09:54 on 24th December 2025 and deleted just 16 minutes later by @WikiBayer (clearly this is not enough time for the Wikidata community to comment on an item's notability) I was in the process of updating the item with identifiers (LOC, VIAF, ISNI and via https://mix-n-match.toolforge.org/?#/search/%22Karen%20shaw%20Becker%22 ) when it was deleted. I requested undeletion on their talk page with the LOC identifier which I had added to the item and which has always been enough for notability and a link to a New York Times Best Selling Books listing (which was rejected as promotional). Similar listing links are used on her co-author's Wikipedia article at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rodney_Habib whose primary claim to notability according to the lede is co-authoring the two books with Karen Becker. Piecesofuk (talk) 16:52, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

I have undeleted it because it seems it was deleted 13s after the addition of an identifier, which the deleting administrator could easily have missed. Please try to add more information soon. Bovlb (talk) 03:18, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, I've updated it, added external IDs and a reference Piecesofuk (talk) 07:07, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

@Bovlb I've noticed that the item creator seems to have tried recreating this item at Karen Becker (Q137569780) and was subsequently banned https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Proactivepaws by @WikiBayer Is it worth undeleting that item and merging and also unbanning them? Piecesofuk (talk) 07:41, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

The new ID are more adequate than the Reflink list from the New York Times. @Piecesofuk. In accordance with the terms of use, is Undisclosed paid editing a violation. The edits clearly show that this person is engaged in paid editing. Therefore, the block is definitely correct. The user has the right to explain themselves and request an unblock, but he must do this themselve WikiBayer (talk) 08:03, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

I have undeleted and merged Q137555074 and Q137569780 (cc @Saroj).

While undeletion of the original item does have some relevance, it does not counter the repeated recreation of a deleted item and the promotion-only editing (whether self-promotion or paid editing). I see no reason here to reverse the block, especially given the lack of unblock request. Bovlb (talk) 17:26, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Saldanha-mareo

Saldanha-mareo 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Creating items from small Wikipedias, which haven't Wikidata item. But many items from small Wikipedias should be deleted not massively transferred to Wikidata. Shock-blocking for two weeks. ―Estopedist1 (talk) 08:11, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

 Comment Currently I am working through his bot-like creations which are related to Estonia. If you are going to mass-delete his creations, then firstly focus to items which hasn't label! If the item has label then very likely other users' work may be lost--Estopedist1 (talk) 09:23, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Report concerning User:~2025-43029-46

~2025-43029-46 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Several edits on Q16146159 that don't improve the item but instead harm it (Special:Diff/2447240307; Special:Diff/2447807138; Special:Diff/2447811062 and others) ―Regioncalifornia (talk) 15:50, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

I think the edits might have been done in good faith, even though they didn't improve the item. Thus I gave just a warning. Maybe some other admin can assess whether a block is necessary. Samoasambia ✎ 18:50, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Alex11199 r

Alex11199 r 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: WP:3RR at Q11465 ―Sîmbotin (talk) 18:47, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

This looks more like content dispute to me. The both of you should take the dispute to the item talk page and come to a consensus about the item. The user in question seems responsive to messages so I won't take action for now. Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 18:57, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

@Jianhui67: Please see his last answer on the page User talk:Alex11199 r. --Sîmbotin (talk) 19:15, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

I have closely followed the discussion on their talk page. Their initial response was actually good, as it shows that they are open to discussion. However, you chose to continue templating them with warning templates without engaging in the discussion, causing them to reply tersely. While their responses are terse and provoking, I also feel that simply templating them with vandalism warning templates does not help much either. You should have nicely explained your POV to them and started a cordial discussion, and then the both of you should try to come to a consensus on what should be best for the disputed item. Further edits to the item without proper discussion may result in sanctions for the both of you. Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 05:32, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

I am the user.

I prepared a message to continue to discuss with him but now I cant send because I think he blocked me because I attack him with my message.

This time I literally did not say anything and wanted to send him. Alex11199 r (talk) 16:21, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Alex11199 r is not blocked anywhere and has never been blocked. They are free to seek consensus for the proposed changes and should do so rather than edit warring. There is an ongoing AfD on ro.wp involving the article that Alex11199 r is entering into the sitelinks list of velocity (Q11465), and we should not change the sitelink here until we have a resolution on the issues.  —Andrei^talk 19:39, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

By being blocked, I meant that Sîmbotin blocked me from talking with him. I literally can't send any messages to him. I just wanted to talk with him and reach a common point, as Jianhui67 said.

But HOW do you want a resolution on the issue? I am just curious. Alex11199 r (talk) 19:43, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

I know you want consensus, but how?

If Sîmbotin comes here, I will talk with him and see if he agrees to have a discussion and point his arguments too. Alex11199 r (talk) 19:48, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Sîmbotin has never blocked you anywhere onwiki, and only administrators have the ability to block users onwiki. You are free to approach him on his Wikidata talk page, or start a discussion on the disputed item's talk page and ping him to propose changes. Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 04:21, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

stopping Rebot

Can this bot be blocked until the current problem is corrected? The bot user has not responded, and the admin who granted the bot flag has been contacted, but the bot is continuing to make hundreds of edits applying individual of taxon (P10241) incorrectly across all data items for biological taxa. --EncycloPetey (talk) 21:37, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

I added a block but took it away after a couple minutes after noticing that Paucabot has now stopped the bot and did respond on their user talk page to your concerns. Samoasambia ✎ 21:52, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

Report concerning User:IgorArapov

IgorArapov 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Self-promotion ―Amomum (talk) 04:09, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Immanuelle

The editor User:Immanuelle has previously been noted for making low-quality edits to mass Japanese-language items without checking the Japanese text(Wikidata:井戸端/Archive/2025#誤った英語ラベルを大量追加する利用者がいる, Wikidata:Project_chat/Archive/2025/09#I_am_implementing_近代社格_(P13723)_with_quickstatements), and recent discussions have highlighted that the behavior has not sufficiently improved.

There are three people who support the block as follows.

Block supporters: Mariobanana (Me), Higa4, Mcampany

English is not my native language, so please ask if anything is unclear.

Regards Mariobanana (talk) 04:47, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

 Support

As context for administrators looking at this case, I appreciate that it seems like Immanuelle has been trying to clean up their messes with a series of bot requests. However, the fundamental issue is that this user insists on editing in areas where they do not have the language ability to do so. They were banned on French Wikipedia for poorly using machine translation, they're banned on English Wikipedia (with a specific note in that unblock request to not use machine translation), and in July they were successfully deterred from editing Okanagan in Wikidata's English project chat. Their post last week on the Wikiproject Shinto page suggests to me that this user still doesn't understand that they shouldn't edit content for languages that they cannot read and understand without machine translation. It's unlikely that there are many Korean- or Chinese-speaking users interested in Shinto shrines who can catch any errors that they make, and I worry that if they make a bot request to mass-edit labels, the person reviewing it may assume in good faith that Immanuelle understands Korean or Chinese when they do not.

I also mentioned in the 3rd Japanese project chat link that Mariobanana linked to that I am concerned about the quality of their edits as a whole because the database they are citing doesn't have English-language content on the individual database pages, and Immanuelle doesn't even read Japanese well enough to transliterate kana correctly (as demonstrated by the very first post in Mariobanana's first link), which is one of the first things that a native English speaker like Immanuelle would learn how to do when they learn Japanese.

This might be a little nitpicky, but some of their recent edits are also, frankly, bizarre. They seem interested in dates recently and created this item, which seems to refer to October 30, 2025 using romanized Japanese, but uses an archaic name for the month of October. It's kind of like if someone were to refer to write "2025 "Winterfylleth" 30" today. It just doesn't make sense for a modern year to have an ancient month attached to it, but it's hard to spot because it requires an English speaker knowing enough about Japanese to know what Reiwa and Kannazuki refer to or a Japanese speaker being interested in the content of an English label.

Again, I appreciate that this user is using bot requests to clean up their incorrect usage of instance of (P31). However, I think a block would be ideal because they don't seem to be learning from the problems they encountered on other Wikis and are repeating them here despite being told to stop. Thank you. Mcampany (talk) 06:57, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Inquiry regarding deletion of Q137612065 and Q137611303

Hello Saroj,

I am writing to kindly inquire about the deletion of the items for "Rocket Science Baltics" (Q137612065) and "Simonas Naudžius" (Q137611303). I understand they were removed due to "notability not established" and "promotion."

I would appreciate your guidance on how to properly re-establish these entries. Both the company and the individual are established entities in the Baltic digital marketing sector. For the company, I can provide official registration data from the Lithuanian Centre of Registers. For the individual, I can provide links to independent industry associations (like LiMA) and speaking engagements at professional summits.

Could you please advise which specific independent sources or identifiers would be sufficient to prove notability according to Wikidata standards?

My goal is to contribute accurate, structured data to the platform.

Thank you for your time and help. Gabrielastankevic (talk) 14:59, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Inquiry regarding deletion of Q137612065 and Q137611303

Issue #2512291503203

(describe the issue for which you need an administrator's decision; don't include "Gabrielastankevic (talk) 15:03, 29 December 2025 (UTC)")

Author and time of the request

Gabrielastankevic; 15:43, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Decision

(to be filled in by an administrator)

Hi!

I am writing to kindly inquire about the deletion of the items for "Rocket Science Baltics" (Q137612065) and "Simonas Naudžius" (Q137611303). I understand they were removed due to "notability not established" and "promotion."

I would appreciate your guidance on how to properly re-establish these entries. Both the company and the individual are established entities in the Baltic digital marketing sector. For the company, I can provide official registration data from the Lithuanian Centre of Registers. For the individual, I can provide links to independent industry associations (like LiMA) and speaking engagements at professional summits.

Could you please advise which specific independent sources or identifiers would be sufficient to prove notability according to Wikidata standards? My goal is to contribute accurate, structured data to the platform.

Thank you for your time and help.

Report concerning User:Amara-Amaziɣ

Amara-Amaziɣ 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: vandalisme sur Maghreb (Q28227) : met Berbérie comme équivalent de Maghreb (et ce en plusieurs langue), met en langue d’origine que c’est le Maroc et en gentilé Marocain ―Olivier Tanguy (talk) 17:12, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Report concerning User:70.35.222.66

70.35.222.66 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: multiple vandalisms accross many years.

This user make multiple vandalisms since at least 2019 of various types:

• either they change a minor data with a probable value (example)
• either they change a minor data with very false value (example on 2022-02-01 I’ve just reverted)
• either they play with other IPs to modify various properties about mainly two topics: Hitler and Greek mythology, for instance I’ve just cleaned Georges Scott (Q4422452) after they played with other IPs to convert this item to Adolf Hitler (see for instance this version),
• sometimes after playing they self-revert their changes, or delete the properties (sometimes loosing the valid pre-existing informations).

Some of these vandalisms were sometimes cleaned shortly after, but some remain. I’ve started to clean the remaining vandalisms of this initial IP from 2019 to 2021, but when I check some page (e.g. Ginette Kolinka (Q24932627)) we can see they play with other IPs and these other IPs play with other ones, etc. So there is quite some work to clean up everything.

I’ve let a message on Talk:Q4422452 with some of these other IPs, but I can add (to be checked further):

• 194.214.0.104
• 85.14.154.6
• 192.214.202.144
• 185.58.10.62 (blocked on frwiki for 5 years in 2023, because regular vandalism since 2017, they received multiple warnings)
• 87.231.172.104 (multiple vandalisms on frwiki, not blocked but multiple warnings in the history)
• ~2025-41142-00
• ~2025-41552-93
• Jeromedu78 (rare registered username)
• and other ones

I pretty sure they are French (example) and I guess they are teenagers (because this type of change or this one).

So a bit help would be needed to warn or block some of these IPs and clean the remaining vandalisms. ―~ Seb35 [^_^] 23:48, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

appeal against several decisions rejecting deletion requests

Yesterday I was horrified to discover that the administrator Martin Urbanec rejected several deletion requests (Q113992692, Q116059529, Q116119238, Q116157412, Q116178047, Q116178077, Q116188658, Q116188795, Q116188839, Q112601363, Q132731898, Q133250624, Q133502267, Q135825673) simply because the data object contains the property record number (Germany) (P12012). Even after he explained his decision to me on his talk page, I remain stunned by it. If this is confirmed here, then Wikidata might as well be renamed Wikigarbage. If an association, a company or a cooperative is relevant only because of the property P12012. Then you could just create an entry for an association like the Sportverein Leipziger Neuseenland. You'll find virtually no information about this association beyond its registration in the register of associations. Furthermore, a shell corporation like Sachsenwald Energy would also be notable. This shows how "reliable" this government source is. It relies on information provided by associations and companies, which, in my view, makes it nothing more than user-generated content. I hope that all Wikidata administrators will reconsider the administrator's decision. --Gymnicus (talk) 10:43, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

This was already discussed at my talk page.

In short: The linked items can be described (as evidenced by their content) using publicly available and serious references. WD:N#2 requires describability (using references), which is fulfilled. It does not require media coverage or meeting Wikipedia-like notability criteria. As such, I believe the RfDs were closed correctly. Of course, if someone thinks my policy interpretation is incorrect, I'd be happy to hear the arguments.

Best wishes for 2026, Martin Urbanec (talk) 13:21, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

Report concerning User:~2026-1623

~2026-1623 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Vandalism XReport ―Peterxy（talk） 01:29, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Blocked by Jasper Deng. Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 04:47, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 04:47, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Tradingsignalh

Tradingsignalh 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 07:54, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

 Done Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 10:24, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 10:24, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Plaça de Maig

Plaça de Maig 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: (Clarification: Not vandalism, since clearly well-motivated. But I didn't know the right template to use.) This user edits about Turkey, and has made ~6 million edits. Many of his edits look fantastic. However, it looks as if enthusiasm to expand content relating to Turkey has led him to make thousands of poor-quality edits which are not getting cleaned up. In particular, as I say on his talk page, he has attributed Turkish citizenship to thousands of individuals on what looks like the enormously weak evidence of their having a Turkish name. I give examples of misattributions there, and others have previously made similar complaints. ―Dsp13 (talk) 12:56, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:~2026-9013

~2026-9013 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) --Printstream (talk) 15:55, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

 Blocked. Samoasambia ✎ 18:13, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Samoasambia ✎ 18:13, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Monostravel2

Monostravel2 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Promotion XReport ―LuniZunie (talk) 04:28, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

 Blocked by WikiBayer. Samoasambia ✎ 09:53, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

I think that this discussion is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, don't hesitate to replace this template with your comment. Samoasambia ✎ 09:53, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Findnearme

Findnearme 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 13:30, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Report concerning User:Svuser1

Svuser1 🔕 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • logs • filter log • block user • block log • SUL (for IP: GUC)) — Reasons: Spam XReport ―MathXplore (talk) 13:34, 2 January 2026 (UTC)